Thursday, September 07, 2006

Vande Mataram

It is the centenary of India's national song and the feeling that it is evoking is anything but patriotic. Some parties are trying to make singing the national song mandatory while another section is raising its voice that the national song is against Muslims. The reasoning given by Muslims is that "Vande Mataram" is a praise of Goddess Durga and so they can't sing it. This seems to make sense. If they don't want to sing Vande Mataram, then let them sing "Jana gana mana" or "Sare Jahan se Achcha". When the intention is merely to hold our patriotic fervour, then any patriotic song should do. So, why are we getting into these controversial issues again and again? I see no reason but politics. But why does such politics exist? What makes politicians believe that they can garner votes of a particular section by going against another? Everything again boils down to the voting public's reasons to support a party. It is that bad decision that people make once in four or five years that fuels all these controversies 365 days a year.

"Nenju pOrukuthilaye inda nilai ketta manitharai ninainduvitaal nenju pOrukuthilaye"
- Bharathi

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lo kar lo baat. Sikhs will not sing Vande Mataram tomorrow: SGPC @ http://wwrn.org/article.php?idd=22639 Not short of jokers are we? Okay Jains, Buddhists, Parsees, SC's, ST's and OBC's lets have your representation in this circus too.

08 September, 2006 01:34  
Blogger Vetty Max said...

Fraud centenary, unnecessary controversy. The author of the piece, Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay was himself not alive a 100 years back, God only knows what anniversary they are celebrating.

08 September, 2006 02:12  
Blogger Ram said...

very true...nenju porukkudhilayae...

08 September, 2006 05:47  
Blogger Jammy said...

@indohstani
Sikhs also? OMG

@Vetty
Wow! that's something I never thought about. Yes, Bankim died by 1894. So he couldn't have possibly written anything in 1906!!!
Anand Math came in 1882. The anniversary should have been in 1992 and not 2006.

@Ram
Yes

08 September, 2006 09:48  
Blogger Ravi said...

What makes politicians believe that they can garner votes of a particular section by going against another?

I guess it all boils down to the voting public. As long as the public gives importance to these inconsequential issues, we will keep seeing these needless and destructive events.

11 September, 2006 09:24  
Blogger Heidi Kris said...

Fraud buggers as K7 said.

12 September, 2006 08:49  

Post a Comment

<< Home